From inquiry to action

Sufferless Decision Brief

Make the question clear, follow its consequences, and choose a next step you can review.

Your answers are not submitted or saved automatically. Save a draft on this device, export a readable copy, or print / save as PDF.

Start with a worked example or a blank brief

Examples are fictional starting points. Edit every assumption for your circumstances. Choosing another example replaces the entries on this page.

Saving is optional and uses this browser only. Nothing here is sent to the Foundation. Other people using this browser may be able to load the draft. An export is a readable Markdown file.

Use your browser’s print destination to choose a printer or Save as PDF.

Brief title

Illustrative brief · Rethinking the school day

Review date

________________________________

01The situation

What is happening? What decision is actually within scope?

A secondary school is considering a later start. The decision concerns the timetable and supporting arrangements, not a claim that one schedule fits every school.

02Affected people and other interests

Name the people or non-overlapping groups affected. Include absent voices, animals, ecological effects, and future generations where relevant.

Students, teachers, families, transport staff, employers of students, and those with caring responsibilities. Include people whose circumstances are missed by averages.

03Domains, tiers, and time

Describe physical, psychological, intellectual, and spiritual experiences. Identify the relevant scale and time horizon without counting one outcome again at a wider tier.

Physical: sleep and fatigue. Psychological: morning pressure and belonging. Intellectual: readiness to learn. Spiritual: purpose and meaningful participation. Follow relational and system effects, including travel and resource use, without counting the same student outcome twice.

04Evidence and unknowns

Separate what is reported, observed, inferred, and uncertain. Record sources, alternative explanations, and what would change your view.

Review local sleep opportunity, attendance, travel, staffing and family constraints. The cited Seattle study is informative but cannot establish the effect in this school. Seek student and staff accounts alongside appropriate outcome measures; record competing explanations.

05Alternatives

Include maintaining current conditions and a smaller change. What could reduce demand, support capacity, or improve the surrounding system?

Retain the current timetable; test a limited schedule change; or combine a later start with transport and activity adjustments. Investigate whether a smaller change addresses the main burden.

06Consequences and possible transfers

Who could benefit or bear a new burden? Consider severity, duration, delayed effects, recovery, and reversibility. Record outcomes separately when comparison is inappropriate.

Possible student benefit must be considered alongside later activities, childcare gaps, staff workload, transport cost, unequal access and energy use. No net suffering score is assigned.

07Authority, agency, and safeguards

Who may decide? Whose consent or participation is needed? What boundaries, privacy protections, appeal routes, and independent review apply?

The accountable school authority must consult students, families, teachers and transport staff. Protect privacy and the ability to report difficulty without penalty. Establish a route for concerns and revision.

08A proportionate next step

Name the responsible person, resources, and limits. What is feasible with the current evidence? Is inaction or further inquiry appropriate?

Proposed next step: collect a baseline and co-design a feasible, reversible trial. Confirm resources, responsibilities, exceptions and a review date before any timetable change.

09Review and change of course

What will you observe? Who can raise concerns or pause the action? What result would lead you to stop, adapt, or reverse it?

Review disruption during transition and outcomes over the agreed trial period. Disaggregate access and burden by group. If attendance, caring arrangements, or staff workload worsen materially, investigate and adapt or pause the change.

Based on Sufferless, Chapters 21 and 50–52. This worksheet structures inquiry; it does not certify a decision, provide professional advice, or establish authority to act.

Revisit the seven principles →Explore the interactive map →