From inquiry to action

Sufferless Decision Brief

Make the question clear, follow its consequences, and choose a next step you can review.

Your answers are not submitted or saved automatically. Save a draft on this device, export a readable copy, or print / save as PDF.

Start with a worked example or a blank brief

Examples are fictional starting points. Edit every assumption for your circumstances. Choosing another example replaces the entries on this page.

Saving is optional and uses this browser only. Nothing here is sent to the Foundation. Other people using this browser may be able to load the draft. An export is a readable Markdown file.

Use your browser’s print destination to choose a printer or Save as PDF.

Brief title

Illustrative brief · Evening messages and recovery

Review date

________________________________

01The situation

What is happening? What decision is actually within scope?

The team assumes everyone must answer messages each evening. We want to understand which requests are genuinely urgent before changing the arrangement.

02Affected people and other interests

Name the people or non-overlapping groups affected. Include absent voices, animals, ecological effects, and future generations where relevant.

Team members, the colleague covering urgent requests, people depending on the service, and family or caring relationships affected by evening work. Ask each group directly; do not assume their needs are interchangeable.

03Domains, tiers, and time

Describe physical, psychological, intellectual, and spiritual experiences. Identify the relevant scale and time horizon without counting one outcome again at a wider tier.

Physical: recovery and fatigue. Psychological: pressure to remain available. Intellectual: unclear priorities. Spiritual: conflict between work and other commitments. Examine the individual and relational experience, then organizational conditions. No numeric total is assigned.

04Evidence and unknowns

Separate what is reported, observed, inferred, and uncertain. Record sources, alternative explanations, and what would change your view.

Starting belief: every message needs an immediate answer. Review actual requests and daytime handovers; distinguish an account of pressure from evidence that an essential need was missed. Record exceptions and ask whose experience is absent. This is a fictional example, not measured workplace data.

05Alternatives

Include maintaining current conditions and a smaller change. What could reduce demand, support capacity, or improve the surrounding system?

Keep the current system; clarify which requests are urgent; or test an agreed urgent channel and daytime handover for seven days. Provide a route for genuine emergencies and accommodate different roles.

06Consequences and possible transfers

Who could benefit or bear a new burden? Consider severity, duration, delayed effects, recovery, and reversibility. Record outcomes separately when comparison is inappropriate.

Fewer interruptions could improve recovery. The burden could move to one on-call colleague or to people unable to get necessary help. Track those possibilities separately; count overlapping outcomes once.

07Authority, agency, and safeguards

Who may decide? Whose consent or participation is needed? What boundaries, privacy protections, appeal routes, and independent review apply?

Agree the trial with the team and responsible manager. Protect private communications. Participation in feedback must be voluntary. Anyone noticing an essential unmet need can ask the responsible lead to pause the trial.

08A proportionate next step

Name the responsible person, resources, and limits. What is feasible with the current evidence? Is inaction or further inquiry appropriate?

Proposed next step: collect a short baseline, agree urgent criteria and coverage, then run the seven-day trial only if essential needs can still be met. Assign a named lead and cover arrangements before starting.

09Review and change of course

What will you observe? Who can raise concerns or pause the action? What result would lead you to stop, adapt, or reverse it?

Set the review date before the trial. Ask about interruptions, recovery, missed needs, and unequal workload. A missed essential request or an unmanageable burden on the covering colleague would prompt immediate adaptation or a pause. Compare accounts and revise the starting belief.

Based on Sufferless, Chapters 21 and 50–52. This worksheet structures inquiry; it does not certify a decision, provide professional advice, or establish authority to act.

Revisit the seven principles →Explore the interactive map →